1. One
scene that specifically got to me was when one of the wrongfully imprisoned
subjects charged with murder by the name of Nick Yarris described his time in
prison and how it had an effect on his life afterwards. Nick explained that for
the first two years of his incarceration was kept in solitary confinement and wasn’t
allowed to talk that entire time. They could do whatever they wanted to him and
whatever he said just didn’t matter. He explains how loud the world was, that
he could hear the tires on the road not just their engines. The smell, he
described, was overwhelming after breathing refiltered air for so long. He
became allergic to the world and struggled to breath with the ease everyone is
used to. It was funny to learn that he drives a jeep with no doors and windows to
embrace the freedom of being able to be outside. The tire cover on the spare
tire on the back of his jeep even says, “Eight thousand fifty seven days” which
is the number of days he spent in prison. “Family is everything” was the only
thing he had to say. Today, he works as an advocate against the Death Penalty
and is still waiting for the real murderer’s DNA to be entered into the
national DNA Databank.
2. I
was surprised to hear that ninety percent of cases do not even use biological
evidence, most often any biological evidence that is obtained is usually
destroyed. I learned that there is something called the innocence project and
their mission is to help cases similar to these and to get innocent people off
of death row. They receive thousands of letters from inmates that express their
need to be exonerated and have their charges expunged.
3. After
viewing this documentary, I was left with such a helpless feeling. After these
men were exonerated from their crimes, they were pushed out into the world they
had been kept from for so long. For some, this was for decades. Nothing is how
they remember it and nothing they do will make up for the time they had lost with
their families. One man went as far as to say that “it was almost easier in
prison than it is out here”. It made me think about how many things we take for
granted on a daily basis. Being able to walk outside or even applying for any
job we want. It’s harder to think about the fact that among the 150 that have
been freed during the time of this film, there are still thousands still stuck
behind bars serving time for crimes they haven’t committed. With the way the
judicial system works it is just not easy to get changes passed as one would dream
of.
4. Some
concepts in the film that I may want to research or write about in the future
circle all of the ideas expressed in the documentary. I would be interested in
learning more about how many people are wrongly incarcerated and of that number
how much money is wasted housing these prisoners each year? Additionally, how
often are eyewitness accounts used as evidence in trials against accused
people? In the documentary, this proved to cause a man to be incarcerated for twenty
two years all because one woman’s account of what she thought she saw was
wrong. The other topics of interest this film brought up was treatment of the imprisoned.
More than one account was that the officers are specifically supposed to just
break down inmates to confessing, why aren’t these prisoners being encouraged
to build themselves back up and become an asset to society once they are
released? If they were treated like this would that stigma of being a convict
ever diminish in our society? Most of the people exonerated in this film end up
searching for a job their whole life and waiting for evidence to expunge their
record. I would be interesting in learning how the system works and why it is
that they still are stuck with this record until the real convict is caught and
put in prison.
I also happened to pick the same documentary and shared a lot of your views. It is unfortunate how many things we take for granted. Do you think that false convictions will still be as pertinent today given the development of various new technologies and medical testing equipment?
ReplyDeleteI feel that there, unfortunately, will always be false convictions just because DNA is such a fragile yet important piece of evidence. I would love to see less convictions but we can only hope for this number to diminish over time as investigations of crimes improve.
Delete